7 results for 'cat:"Property" AND cat:"Restraining Order"'.
J. Arterburn finds the district court properly affirmed defendant's county bench trial convictions and sentences for damage to property and disturbing the peace. Defendant's ex-girlfriend recorded defendant as he attempted to enter her home through a window, where he knocked over a dresser with a TV on it, causing damage. The court considered all sentencing factors, as well as defendant's criminal history. Furthermore, misdemeanor and municipal code violations do not require a presentence investigation. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Arterburn , Filed On: January 23, 2024, Case #: A-23-461, Categories: restraining Order, property Crimes
J. Reiber finds that the trial court properly entered a civil stalking order against a citizen to protect his neighbor following two altercations concerning a private road they shared. The citizen argues that the trial court erred in considering his two acts of physical violence as threats, and his actions were privileged in defense of personal property. The neighbor had to seek medical attention after the second incident and fears for her safety. His behavior does qualify as threatening and the citizen’s actions were not a defense of property.
Court: Vermont Supreme Court, Judge: Reiber, Filed On: January 12, 2024, Case #: 23-AP-221, Categories: property, Emotional Distress, restraining Order
J. Rickman finds that the trial court improperly ruled in favor of the county in an injunctive relief action brought by the couple. The action arose after the county issued a letter demanding the couple remove a gate impeding access to a portion of a road which was condemned by the government. The trial court incorrectly found that the action was barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The county's ownership interest in the disputed property had ended. The couple's claims that the county threatened to remove or damage the gate to the property created an inverse condemnation claim and sovereign immunity was therefore waived. Reversed.
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals, Judge: Rickman, Filed On: June 26, 2023, Case #: A23A0193, Categories: property, restraining Order
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Riedmann finds the district court properly entered the harassment protection order against the property owner involved in a boundary dispute resulting in trespass, vandalism and a fight resulting in hospitalization. Evidence presented at the show cause hearing, including the petition, affidavit, testimony and exhibits outweigh arguments that the injured party’s lack of recollection and failure to identify a series of acts precludes the order. The aggressor’s argument ignores evidence of and reference to the two-year dispute. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Riedmann, Filed On: June 20, 2023, Case #: A-22-801, Categories: property, restraining Order, Assault
J. Lasnik grants the alpine club a temporary restraining order stopping the park owner its employees from restraining access to the Kitsap Rhododendron Preserve, as part of the park owner's objection that the alpine club does not have a valid easement to the preserve owned by the park owner. The alpine club shows that “irreparable harm is likely to result in the absence of the injunction," because it would be unable to put on its theatrical performances without access to the venue and thus would have to cancel the performances, including the 100th anniversary of the theater program that involved hundreds of volunteers and 1,500 tickets sold.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Lasnik, Filed On: May 24, 2023, Case #: 2:19cv1819, NOS: Trademark - Property Rights, Categories: property, Trademark, restraining Order